Shacknews review

[Mossman]

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2006...titanquest_1.x

[Srikandi]

Nice review -- reviewer didn't really miss any of the important points

[killnpc]

does shacknews do a lot of game reviews?

[DaveyJJ]

Agreed. And the way he tackled the D2 versus TQ discussion and worked that into his review was very well thought through. His overall recommendation of "great game" and "well worth the purchase" is exciting. Too bad no one has yet really given the editor more than a cursory metnion though (although this review does say it could be TQ's ultimate trump card).

Overall well done. (Anyone know why they don't give a number rating so to affect Gameranking.com?)

[Mossman]

check the momments, he's been praised

http://www.shacknews.com/ja.zz?comments=42666

[Icarus]

It's a little strange that he didn't mention the level editor in the same breath as the lack of randomization. I mean, that's sort of the sole mitigating factor for the lack of level randomization. Otherwise, a good review with many salient points I'd say! Indeed, I really sympathize with his complaint about low-level monsters being over-used in the level design.